I don't think that the second section has any actual connection to the first, and is beyond the intended scope of the original change. I therefore intend to move, at the
This is in my opinion a lesser change (because it reduces the scope of the change), and therefore if my proposed change is adopted by the
I'm willing to put my name to this because it would not oblige me to recuse myself from business next year in Helsinki. Any proposal on this year's agenda as new business that has my name on it that gets first passage this year and thus is passed on to Worldcon 75 necessarily requires me to recuse myself from presiding over its ratification.
ETA: timill catches me napping on the Standing Rules; thus the strikeouts above. Sigh.