Another Take on the Why-Should-I-Have-to-Pay-to-Vote Question

I've now seen and replied to a suggestion that we rename the current "supporting membership" to "WSFS membership" in order to more clearly identify why you have to buy it in order to vote for awards sanctioned by WSFS. There are some good points made, although I'm unsure if just changing the name would actually get the point across to people who don't think paying anything to vote is fair.

I'm going to disable comments on this entry because if you have an opinion about it, you should take it over there.

Tags: hugo award, wsfs

Ageism

I periodically field this question from people about WSFS business: "Is there a minimum age limit for voting on WSFS business?" The answer is No,…
But What If We Didn't?

On January 7, 2021, John Scalzi wrote an article entitled, "But What If We Didn't?" In it, he pointed out how the US Republican Party…
Inside Slider? More Like a Curve Ball

The forecast "inside slider" snowstorm coming down out of the north (rather than from the west) moved more slowly than originally forecast, so it did…

Comments for this post were disabled by the author

Another Take on the Why-Should-I-Have-to-Pay-to-Vote Question

Ageism

But What If We Didn't?

Inside Slider? More Like a Curve Ball