Another Take on the Why-Should-I-Have-to-Pay-to-Vote Question

I've now seen and replied to a suggestion that we rename the current "supporting membership" to "WSFS membership" in order to more clearly identify why you have to buy it in order to vote for awards sanctioned by WSFS. There are some good points made, although I'm unsure if just changing the name would actually get the point across to people who don't think paying anything to vote is fair.

I'm going to disable comments on this entry because if you have an opinion about it, you should take it over there.

Tags: hugo award, wsfs

Comments for this post were disabled by the author