Kevin Standlee (kevin_standlee) wrote,
Kevin Standlee
kevin_standlee

Worldcons and Site Selection

The loss of the Seattle Worldcon bid has left a lot of people saying, "oh, that proves we should have kept selecting bids three years in advance, like we always did since I started paying attention." I disagree, and I've been saying so in various places today, particularly here and here. (The former suggests to me that a lot of people aren't paying close attention to where and when Worldcons have been for the past ten or twenty years. As far as I can tell, some people think one Worldcon per decade in Chicago is "too often" while simultaneously bemoaning that it hasn't gone back to the UK already even though the most recent one was less than four years ago. Selective memories, people.)

Regarding the lead time and its effect on Worldcons and Worldcon site selection, Deb Geisler says it better than I can. So does Cheryl Morgan.

To my knowledge, a three-year lead time would not necessarily have improved Seattle's ability to commit to facilities. Their committee has not said specifically that a lack of sufficient lead time was the issue, and I am unsure that it was. It may have been, but there may have been other things involved as well.

In 2002, we still selected sites three years in advance. (The election was at Aussiecon Three in Melbourne, 1999.) Both of the original 2002 Worldcon bids -- Seattle and San Francisco -- were obliged to fold for reasons that actually didn't have anything to do with other groups dropping money on their prospective sites. In the former, the person controlling the key hotels decided he didn't want the business, and in the latter, the headquarters hotel priced the bid away, chasing more-expensive business (that they didn't get -- I was happy to hear that the "Jukebox" was empty on Labor Day weekend 2002). The Bay Area was lucky -- we had another Worldcon-capable site fifty miles to the south that was eager for our business. Seattle wasn't so lucky and had to fold.
Tags: site selection, worldcon
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 3 comments